|
As the year 2010 is finishing, one of the hot topics for conservation
is social networks. These are the sites which allows people to build
lists of friends and chat and interact online.
For a long period of time, a good majority of communication online
was conducted through anonymous 'nicks' or nicknames. It was not
common place for people to provide, chat, or interact online with
their real world name and persona.
That all changed with the introduction of social networking sites
such as Twitter, Myspace and Facebook. Up until they were launched,
online communication was often conducted through email and real
time chat programs such as ICQ.
The drawback with email is that people can become annoyed at being
spammed with aimless messages. And spam can get in the way of the
message even being noticed. Chat programs require people to be online
at the same time.
The advantage to social networking sites, is that a person is given
a web page all about themselves. They can update it at their discretion,
and readers can choose when and if they want to access it. The simplicity
of the communication is it's advantage, and the convenience of when
people want to respond or participate in a dialogue.
Social networks can help keep people in touch with passing acquaintances,
work colleagues, fringe family members, or people you would generally
not have the time to communicate with. All these people, who may
have become estranged, a relationship can be continued with. The
only thing that needs to be updated is one profile page, which thousands
of people can then access. Organising a wedding, football practice,
a school reunion, or a similar occasion is also simplified.
The criticisms of social networking sites include their privacy,
the long term effects of having your life in digital data forever,
what the social network companies and governments may do with the
data in future, the stealing and spoofing of real world identity,
people stalking others they have fallen afoul of and cyber bullying.
|